I promised you a blog post on Strycker’s Bay losing its program at 61 West 87th Street. Well here it is.
There are, of course, two sides to every story. Here on Neighborhood Commons I will share with you the version that will force Strycker’s Bay to leave the boundaries of the West Side Urban Renewal Area after a 50 year history here. It will have to be abbreviated because our role in creating the low-income cooperative that now seeks to evict us is too long to go into here. However, anyone who is interested in the details of the story should feel free to contact me.
You should take note before getting down to the nitty gritty of this story that:
· However because of the J51 Strycker’s Bay worked so hard to secure for the building there is an annual abatement of $62,098.
· Therefore the adjusted annual property tax for this building is $5,093.
· Without the tax abatement benefit, the monthly maintenance fee for each of these cooperative units would have to increase by more than $1,000 per month making it unaffordable to MOST of the shareholders there.
So here are some of the facts:
1. 1959 - Strycker’s Bay – Founded by Father Henry Browne
2. 1959-1975 -- Strycker’s Bay’s works with its membership (the council) to insure that urban renewal does not uproot and displace area residents and supports efforts to keep “mom and pop” stores from being pushed out of the neighborhood
3. 1975-1999 – worked with tenants of occupied city owned buildings to win the right to manage, renovate and purchase their buildings (debt free) as low-income housing develop fund corporations HDFCs) under Article XI of the NY Private Housing Finance Law. The buildings, as long as they remain low income according to income guidelines, would continue to benefit from J51 tax abatement that, yes Strycker’s Bay facilitated.
4. 2005 – Thanks to the support of two very committed residents of the 61 West 87th Street HDFC, Strycker’s Bay renovated and got the certificate of occupancy for the basement of their building.
5. 2005 – New shareholder buys into the 61 West 87th Street HDFC. A recent immigrant to this country working to build a good life from him and his family was welcomed to the neighborhood and the building by the same two supportive tenants that helped Strycker’s Bay secure affordable office space in their building.
6. 2005 – New shareholder becomes HDFC officer.
7. 2005 – Strycker’s Bay seeks 10 year lease. New HDFC Officer blocks this from moving forward. When asked why during a meeting between the Strycker’s Bay board and the 61 West 87th Street HDFC, he said “because I don’t want you here.” The result was a compromise 5 year lease with Strycker’s Bay hoping for a change of heart.
8. 2010 March – Strycker’s Bay pleads with the HDFC to offer us another lease
a. “Strycker’s Bay has been on the West Side for the last 50 years and has provided a vehicle for the community to resolve common problems. We have been instrumental in creating and preserving more than 600 units of affordable rental and cooperative housing for the West Side Community. The cooperative ownership of your building is the result of several generations of Strycker’s Bay activists’ commitment to the preservation of affordable housing. We are turning to you, the owners of a building we helped preserve, for reciprocal assistance. The programs and services we offer are of great value to the people who live on the Upper West Side and the space we now occupy is essential to our continued assistance.”
9. 2010 – May 31st (Memorial Day) Strycker’s Bay was served with a 30-day notice to terminate our tenancy notice of termination.
Post to be continued….
2 comments:
It would be interesting to know if the new shareholder bought his apartment shares based on the income guidelines that were supposed to keep the HDFC affordable low-income housing.
Kelley Williams,
first: keep up the good fight and thanks for your posts.
second: I have no idea what the criteria are for buying into the coop or whether there are income limits or a fixed price re a resale, or if there are term limits for directors, who (else) in the coop is working behind the scenes to deny the program a lease--but something smells very FISHY to me when/if ONE director is calling the shots at HFDC.
In adddition to making a big stink at Stringers office and at the city council, and calling all newspapers and tv channels, maybe a little footwork to figure out WHO--which individuals-- stand to benefit and why is in order. Try to find out if maybe there is a Developer in the wings interested in the location who is already dealing with cetain local individuals and the City behind the scenes....
Hope this helps.
Post a Comment